Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.juit.ac.in:8080/jspui/jspui/handle/123456789/9085
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPatel, Harun M.-
dc.contributor.authorN., Malleshappa-
dc.contributor.authorNoolvi-
dc.contributor.authorSharma, Poonam-
dc.contributor.authorJaiswal, Varun-
dc.contributor.authorBansal, Sumit-
dc.contributor.authorLohan, Sandeep-
dc.contributor.authorKumar, Suthar Sharad-
dc.contributor.authorAbbot, Vikrant-
dc.contributor.authorDhiman, Saurabh-
dc.contributor.authorBhardwaj, Varun-
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-11T08:03:23Z-
dc.date.available2023-01-11T08:03:23Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir.juit.ac.in:8080/jspui/jspui/handle/123456789/9085-
dc.description.abstractDrug design is a process which is driven by technological breakthroughs implying advanced experimental and computational methods. Nowadays, the techniques or the drug design methods are of paramount importance for prediction of biological profile, identification of hits, generation of leads, and moreover to accelerate the optimization of leads into drug candidates. Quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) has served as a valuable predictive tool in the design of pharmaceuticals and agrochemicals. From decades to recent research, QSAR methods have been applied in the development of relationship between properties of chemical substances and their biological activities to obtain a reliable statistical model for prediction of the activities of new chemical entities. Classical QSAR studies include ligands with their binding sites, inhibition constants, rate constants, and other biological end points, in addition molecular to properties such as lipophilicity, polarizability, electronic, and steric properties or with certain structural features. 3D-QSAR has emerged as a natural extension to the classical Hansch and Free–Wilson approaches, which exploit the three-dimensional properties of the ligands to predict their biological activities using robust chemometric techniques such as PLS, G/PLS, and ANN. This paper provides an overview of 1-6 dimension-based developed QSAR methods and their approaches. In particular, we present various dimensional QSAR approaches, such as comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA), comparative molecular similarity analysis, Topomer CoMFA, self-organizing molecular field analysis, comparative molecule/pseudo receptor interaction analysis, comparative molecular active site analysis, and FLUFF-BALL, 4D-QSAR, and G-QSAR approaches.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherJaypee University of Information Technology, Solan, H.P.en_US
dc.subjectDrug designen_US
dc.subjectQSARen_US
dc.subjectMethodologyen_US
dc.titleQuantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) studies as strategic approach in drug discoveryen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.